Uptown Markham - Riverwalk East Building B — Rental Market Data

Uptown Markham – Riverwalk East Building B lists one active unit as of August 31, 2026, with an asking rent of $2,350 per month (minimum, average, and median all identical given the single listing). The suite spans 650 square feet at an asking rate of $3.62 per square foot. The 100 percent layout share is a one-bedroom plus den, placing the entire active inventory in the compact entry-level-plus tier rather than multi-bedroom executive configurations.

The sole active layout at Uptown Markham – Riverwalk East Building B is a one-bedroom plus den, representing 100 percent of available inventory with a single listing. That unit asks $2,350 per month across 650 square feet, equating to $3.62 per square foot. No two-bedroom, three-bedroom, or studio tiers currently appear in the active pipeline.

With only one unit on the market, Uptown Markham – Riverwalk East Building B shows a minimum and maximum asking rent of $2,350 per month, producing a dollar spread of zero and a percentage spread of zero. The entry-level suite is a one-bedroom plus den at 650 square feet and $3.62 per square foot, which is also the peak asking configuration. A meaningful pricing range cannot be derived from a single listing; renters should reference the 90-day realized lease average of $2,606 per month for context on typical closed pricing at this address.

Active den premium and square-footage delta figures for Uptown Markham – Riverwalk East Building B are unquantified due to insufficient paired sample data, so no marginal cost per square foot for the den component can be reliably stated. Parking stall premiums likewise cannot be isolated from the current dataset; the paired sample is too small or contains anomalous outliers to support a defensible dollar figure. Renters should request a written parking add-on quote directly from the leasing office before signing.

Uptown Markham – Riverwalk East Building B asks $2,350 per month at $3.62 per square foot, compared to the Markham City Centre submarket asking average of $2,711 per month and $3.58 per square foot. The building's nominal rent is $361 below the submarket asking average, a gap fully explained by its 650-square-foot footprint versus the submarket implied average of 757 square feet; on a per-square-foot basis the building actually trades 1.1 percent above the submarket asking rate. The single active listing represents one out of 96 available units in the Markham City Centre submarket, or roughly 1.0 percent of total active inventory.

Uptown Markham – Riverwalk East Building B realized an average lease rent of $2,485 per month over the trailing year, which is $50 above the four-comp benchmark of $2,435 and below the submarket average of $2,500. Against Uptown Markham – Riverwalk East Building A at 18 Uptown Dr (0.07 km, 27 closed leases, $2,456 average rent, $3.66 per square foot, 690 sq ft), the subject commands a $29-per-month higher rent. Versus Uptown Markham – River Park C at 8228 Birchmount Rd (0.12 km, 13 closed leases, $2,281 average rent, $3.53 per square foot, 650 sq ft), the subject's realized rent is $204 higher per month. The subject trades at a $19-per-month lower rent than Uptown Markham – River Park B at 1 Uptown Dr (0.13 km, 14 closed leases, $2,504 average rent, $3.63 per square foot, 704 sq ft) and a $12-per-month lower rent than Uptown Markham – Riverside Building A at 15 Water Walk Dr (0.13 km, 35 closed leases, $2,497 average rent, $3.68 per square foot, 697 sq ft). All four competitors recorded active closed-lease volume, so each provides a realized pricing reference rather than a zero-transaction architectural placeholder.

Uptown Markham – Riverwalk East Building B leases at $3.38 per square foot across an average 753-square-foot suite, a rate that sits below every active competitor in the immediate cluster and below the four-comp average of $3.63 per square foot, while delivering 49 to 103 more interior square feet than each peer. Against Riverwalk East Building A, the subject trades at a $0.28-per-square-foot (7.7%) discount and provides 63 more interior square feet; the $29 higher nominal rent is driven entirely by the larger footprint, not a per-unit premium. Compared with River Park C, the subject offers a $0.15-per-square-foot (4.2%) discount and 103 additional square feet, which explains why the subject's $204 higher monthly rent reflects extra livable space rather than stronger asset pricing. Versus River Park B, the subject trades at a $0.25-per-square-foot (6.9%) discount with 49 more square feet, and the $19 lower nominal rent is consistent with a slightly smaller total bill despite the larger suite. Against Riverside Building A, the subject carries a $0.30-per-square-foot (8.2%) discount and 56 more square feet, with the $12 lower rent again attributable to the per-foot rate differential rather than a weaker valuation. In every pairing, the subject's nominal rent variance is a footprint effect, not a premium or discount on the asset itself.

Uptown Markham – Riverwalk East Building B offers a ten-item lifestyle package anchored by an indoor pool, rooftop terrace, dining room and kitchen, and meeting room, placing it in the upper tier of the immediate peer set but short of the wellness and convenience add-ons found at two of its four competitors. The subject's indoor pool distinguishes it from Riverside Building A, which features an outdoor pool and a BBQ area but no indoor aquatic facility; conversely, the subject lacks the sauna and steam room present at both River Park B and River Park C, as well as the business centre at River Park B and the Amazon pick-up lockers and outdoor children's playground at River Park C. The subject's dining room and kitchen are absent from both River Park buildings, giving it a stronger communal-entertainment edge, while its rooftop terrace matches the offering at River Park B, River Park C, and Riverside Building A but replaces the garden-and-courtyard spaces found at Building A and Riverside. This amenity mix—indoor aquatic recreation, full dining and meeting facilities, and a rooftop terrace without spa or co-working add-ons—best serves young professional and dual-income households in their late twenties to mid-thirties who prioritize social and entertainment amenities over wellness suites or remote-work infrastructure.