Rockefeller on Bayview — Rental Market Data

Rockefeller on Bayview has one unit actively listed as of August 31, 2026, with an asking rent of $2,550 per month (minimum, average, and median all identical given the single listing). The suite spans 677 square feet at an asking rate of $3.77 per square foot. The entire active inventory consists of a one-bedroom plus den layout, representing 100 percent of available units, placing this building's current offering squarely in the compact entry-level-plus tier rather than multi-bedroom executive configurations.

The sole active layout at Rockefeller on Bayview is the one-bedroom plus den, accounting for 100 percent of the building's available inventory with a single listing. That unit asks $2,550 per month for 677 square feet, yielding a rate of $3.77 per square foot. No other bedroom tiers—studio, two-bedroom, or three-bedroom—are currently on the market at this address.

With only one unit listed at Rockefeller on Bayview, the minimum and maximum asking rents are both $2,550 per month, producing a dollar spread of zero and a percentage spread of zero. The entry-level and peak suite are the same unit: a one-bedroom plus den at 677 square feet and $3.77 per square foot. Renters evaluating this listing should compare it directly against the 90-day realized average of $2,318 per month to gauge the premium embedded in the current ask.

Rockefeller on Bayview's active den premium cannot be reliably quantified, as the single listed unit already includes a den within its 677-square-foot footprint and no paired comparison without a den exists in the active inventory. Parking stall costs likewise cannot be isolated from the available data; the sample is insufficient to separate a verified monthly parking add-on from the base rent, so no specific parking figure should be assumed when budgeting.

Rockefeller on Bayview's active asking rent of $2,550 per month sits $85 below the Don Valley North submarket average asking rent of $2,635, while its $3.77 per square foot rate is 3.1 percent under the submarket asking benchmark of $3.89 per square foot. The nominal rent gap narrows further when accounting for suite size: the active unit's 677-square-foot footprint closely matches the submarket implied average, meaning the per-square-foot discount is not an artifact of a smaller layout. The building represents one out of 260 active listings in the Don Valley North submarket, a 0.4 percent share of total available inventory.

Rockefeller on Bayview's one-year average realized rent of $2,343 per month sits $5 above the four-comp benchmark of $2,338, with the spread splitting evenly: the building commands a higher monthly rent than NY Place ($93 higher) and The Chelsea ($74 higher), while trading at a lower monthly rent than Empire at NY Towers ($70 lower) and Lotus ($78 lower). NY Place at 17 Kenaston Gardens (0.05 km, 4 closed leases) averaged $2,250 per month at $3.93 per square foot across 588 square feet. Empire at NY Towers at 17 Barberry Place (0.08 km, 8 closed leases) averaged $2,413 per month at $3.78 per square foot across 644 square feet. The Chelsea at 19 Barberry Place (0.11 km, 5 closed leases) averaged $2,269 per month at $3.64 per square foot across 630 square feet. Lotus at 7 Kenaston Gardens (0.12 km, 21 closed leases) averaged $2,421 per month at $3.82 per square foot across 639 square feet. All four competitors recorded active lease volume, so each provides a realized pricing benchmark rather than a reference-only data point.

Rockefeller on Bayview leases at $3.63 per square foot across an average 656-square-foot suite, placing it at a discount below every active competitor on a per-square-foot basis while delivering the largest interior footprint in the immediate cluster. Against NY Place, the subject trades at a $0.30 per square foot (7.6 percent) discount yet provides 68 more interior square feet, so the $93 higher nominal rent reflects the additional space rather than a rate premium. Versus Empire at NY Towers, the subject offers a $0.15 per square foot (4.0 percent) discount and 12 more square feet, producing a $70 lower monthly rent that is a direct function of the larger footprint at a slightly lower rate. The Chelsea comparison is the tightest: a $0.01 per square foot (0.3 percent) discount with 26 additional square feet yields a $74 higher rent, again footprint-driven. Lotus presents the widest spread—a $0.19 per square foot (5.0 percent) discount and 17 more square feet—resulting in a $78 lower monthly rent where the larger suite at a lower rate more than offsets the 2018 building's newer construction. In every pairing, the rent differential is explained by interior square footage rather than a valuation gap, giving cost-conscious renters more living area per dollar than any nearby alternative.

Rockefeller on Bayview anchors its lifestyle package around a full aquatic and wellness suite—indoor pool, hot tub and jacuzzi, sauna and steam room—combined with an EV charging station, a configuration that distinguishes it from three of its four immediate competitors. NY Place (17 Kenaston Gardens) and The Chelsea (19 Barberry Place) offer no pool, hot tub, or spa facilities, relying instead on rooftop terraces, BBQ areas, and café spaces for social programming. Lotus (7 Kenaston Gardens) substitutes a European-inspired spa and yoga studio for the subject's aquatic cluster but still lacks an indoor pool and hot tub. Empire at NY Towers (17 Barberry Place) is the closest amenity match, sharing the pool, hot tub, and sauna, yet adds a golf simulator and library that the subject does not carry; conversely, the subject's EV charging station is absent from all four competitors. The building's package—indoor aquatic recreation, steam wellness, fitness, meeting and media rooms, plus EV infrastructure—suits professionals and small households who prioritize in-building wellness and modern utility access over rooftop social spaces or café-style common areas, making it a strong fit for renters who value a full-service residential experience within a 2006-built asset in the Don Valley North submarket.