Market Data as of August 31, 2026
Landmark of Thornhill I — Rental Market Data
Building Summary & Rental Market Overview
Rental market analytics and building profile as of August 31, 2026.
Landmark of Thornhill I at 7805 Bayview Ave in Markham's West submarket is a 341-suite residential building completed in 1991 by Graywood Developments. As of August 31, 2026, the tower carries a single active listing representing a 0.3 percent availability rate. Recent leasing activity shows two closed leases in the trailing 30 days at an average of $3,425 per month with a 28-day average time on market, and four closed leases over the past 90 days averaging $3,400 per month with a 20-day average DOM.
The active 2-bedroom suite is asking $3,800 per month at $2.92 per square foot across 1,300 square feet, which is a higher rate per square foot than the realized 90-day lease average of $2.77 per square foot. The current listing's 1,300-square-foot footprint is also larger than the 1,232-square-foot average across all tracked historical leases, meaning the nominal rent premium is partly explained by the expanded floor plan. Against the Markham West submarket asking benchmark of $2,730 per month and $3.61 per square foot, Landmark of Thornhill I's active rate sits 19.1 percent below the submarket asking rate per square foot despite a higher nominal monthly figure.
The single active listing has been on market for 75 days, well above the submarket average of 26 days, signaling leasing deceleration on this particular unit even though the building's closed-lease DOM of 20 to 28 days runs at or below the submarket norm. Across all four tracked historical leases, concessions closed exactly at asking with zero dollar spread, indicating landlords have held firm on pricing. Inventory depth is effectively limited to one 2-bedroom option, leaving no multi-unit choice for renters seeking a specific bedroom tier at this address.
Get Monthly Rental Market Updates for Landmark of Thornhill I
Stay ahead of pricing shifts. Monthly summary of closed lease contracts, active asking rates, and available inventory direct to your inbox.
Active Rental Inventory & Asking Rates
Current market availability, asking prices, and unit price histories at Landmark of Thornhill I as of August 31, 2026 (comparing August 2026 vs July 2026).
Active Market Insights & Questions
How has rental availability changed at Landmark of Thornhill I recently?
Landmark of Thornhill I carries one active listing as of August 31, 2026, with a single asking rent of $3,800 per month serving as both the average and median. The available suite spans 1,300 square feet at an asking rate of $2.92 per square foot. This lone listing is a 2-bedroom layout representing 100 percent of active inventory, placing the building's current availability squarely in the multi-bedroom tier rather than compact entry-level one-bedroom suites.
What floor plans and unit layouts are currently available at Landmark of Thornhill I?
The sole active layout at Landmark of Thornhill I is a 2-bedroom unit, accounting for 100 percent of available inventory with one listing. That single 2-bedroom suite asks $3,800 per month across 1,300 square feet, translating to $2.92 per square foot. No 1-bedroom, studio, or 3-bedroom tiers are currently listed, so renters seeking alternative bedroom configurations must look to the broader Markham West submarket.
What is the average asking rent and $/SF by suite size at Landmark of Thornhill I?
Landmark of Thornhill I's single active listing sets both the minimum and maximum asking rent at $3,800 per month, producing a dollar spread of zero and a percentage spread of zero. The entry-level and peak suite are the same 2-bedroom unit at 1,300 square feet and $2.92 per square foot. With only one unit on the market, there is no internal price gradient to compare, and the median asking rent of $3,800 per month reflects this single data point.
How much extra do parking spaces and dens cost at Landmark of Thornhill I?
Active den premiums at Landmark of Thornhill I cannot be quantified due to insufficient paired sample data, and no marginal cost per square foot for additional den space can be reliably calculated. Parking stall costs likewise cannot be isolated from the available transaction records, as the paired sample is too small or contains anomalous outliers to support a defensible monthly figure. Renters should request current parking and den add-on pricing directly from the leasing office.
How do asking rents at Landmark of Thornhill I compare to local and municipal benchmarks?
Landmark of Thornhill I's active asking rent of $3,800 per month exceeds the Markham West submarket average asking rent of $2,730 per month, yet its rate of $2.92 per square foot sits 19.1 percent below the submarket asking benchmark of $3.61 per square foot. The nominal rent premium is explained by the 1,300-square-foot suite being substantially larger than the typical submarket listing, so the per-square-foot cost is actually more competitive. This single listing represents 1 out of 40 active listings across the Markham West submarket, or 2.5 percent of total available inventory.
Recent Leased Transactions & Contract Prices
Recent lease transactions, absorption velocity, and the difference between landlord asking prices and actual prices agreed to by tenants at Landmark of Thornhill I (Data period: For the month of August 2026).
Leased Transaction Insights & Questions
How many suites were leased at Landmark of Thornhill I last month, and how fast did they rent?
Landmark of Thornhill I closed two leases in the trailing 30 days at an average 28 days on market, compared to a 20-day average over 90 days and a 26-day submarket benchmark in Markham West. Over the full tracked year, four leases closed at a 20-day average DOM, with the 90-day window capturing all four transactions. Leasing cadence moderated from a 10-day close in June to a 28-day close in August, indicating a slight deceleration in absorption velocity rather than a pause.
What is the negotiation spread between asking rents and closed lease prices at Landmark of Thornhill I?
Landmark of Thornhill I leases settled on average at exactly 100% of asking price, with zero dollar variance and no annualized savings or gain for either party. All four tracked transactions closed at the listed rate, meaning tenants exercised no measurable negotiation leverage and landlords conceded no pricing across the sample. This at-asking outcome reflects a tight, well-priced inventory where neither side held a structural advantage.
What are typical executed lease prices across different layouts at Landmark of Thornhill I?
The two anchor layouts at Landmark of Thornhill I are the 2-Bedroom (average $3,375/month, 13-day DOM) and the 2-Bedroom + Den (average $3,425/month, 28-day DOM), each representing 50% of closed leases. The 2-Bedroom tier closed two leases at a median of $3,375, with a P25–P75 range of $3,312 to $3,438 across an average 1,200 square foot suite at $2.82 per square foot. The 2-Bedroom + Den tier also closed two leases at a median of $3,425, spanning $3,388 to $3,462 across an average 1,264 square foot suite at $2.71 per square foot. Both tiers represent a small sample size of two transactions each and should be treated as directional indicators only, not broad statistical benchmarks.
What measurable rent premium did suites with parking achieve in closed leases at Landmark of Thornhill I?
Landmark of Thornhill I does not have a reliably isolable leased parking premium, as paired suite-and-parking data is insufficient to calculate a verified monthly add-on. Active listings at the building also show an unreliable or outlier-driven parking figure, so no concrete parking dollar value can be quoted. Tenants should confirm whether parking is bundled into the suite rent or available as a separate assignment directly with the property manager.
How does the lease-to-listing ratio at Landmark of Thornhill I reflect current tenant demand?
Landmark of Thornhill I rents followed a modest dip-and-recover arc across the June-through-August 2026 window, moving from $3,500 in June to $3,425 in August. June closed one lease at $3,500/month and $2.69 per square foot with a 10-day DOM. July closed one lease at $3,250/month and $2.95 per square foot with a 16-day DOM; the nominal rent drop reflects a compact suite footprint rather than property devaluation, as the rate per square foot actually rose. August closed two leases at $3,425/month and $2.71 per square foot with a 28-day DOM, bringing the blended average back toward the mid-$3,400s.
De-Listed & Terminated Rental Market Dynamics
Analyze withdrawn listings, tenant price resistance, and subsequent re-listing discount trends at Landmark of Thornhill I (Data period: For the month of August 2026).
De-Listed Market Analysis & Questions
How many listings de-listed at Landmark of Thornhill I, and what was their re-listing price compared to previous asking?
Landmark of Thornhill I logged two delisted units against two 30-day lease closings, producing a delisted-to-leased ratio of 100% for the trailing month and 50% against lifetime volume. The breakdown includes one terminated listing and one suspended listing, with zero expirations. A 100% delisted-to-leased ratio in a single month signals elevated listing churn and warrants monitoring for sustained pushback on price or tenant demand softness.
How do asking prices on de-listed suites compare to executed leases and active listings at Landmark of Thornhill I?
Landmark of Thornhill I unrented units asked an average of $3,395/month, which is $30/month below realized lease averages nominally due to smaller suite footprints, yet commanded a higher rate per square foot at $2.85 versus the $2.77 realized average. This density inversion confirms that the nominal gap is driven by compact layouts rather than landlord underpricing. Tenants in the delisted cohort faced a steeper per-square-foot burden, demonstrating resistance to high-density pricing in the Markham West submarket.
What market friction causes rental listings to stall or de-list at Landmark of Thornhill I?
Landmark of Thornhill I delisted units sat on market for an average of 32 days, compared to a 20-day realized lease DOM, producing 12 excess marketing days per unit. Those 12 days translate to roughly $1,358 in lost rent at the $3,395 asking rate, plus ongoing condo maintenance fees during the vacancy carry period. Against the 30-day lease DOM of 28 days, the excess narrows to 4 days, or approximately $453 in foregone rent, still a meaningful carrying cost for the owner.
Historical Active Listings & Market Dynamics
Analyze availability, historical asking prices, price per foot ($/SF), and days on market over time. Use filters below to benchmark specific layouts.
| Date | Units Available | Avg Price ($) | Avg SqFt (SF) | Avg PSF ($/SF) | Avg DOM (Days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-27 | 1 | 3450 | 1300 | 2.65 | 111 |
| 2026-04-28 | 1 | 3450 | 1300 | 2.65 | 112 |
| 2026-04-29 | 1 | 3450 | 1300 | 2.65 | 113 |
| 2026-05-28 | 1 | 3500 | 1300 | 2.69 | N/A |
| 2026-05-29 | 1 | 3500 | 1300 | 2.69 | 1 |
| 2026-05-30 | 1 | 3500 | 1300 | 2.69 | 2 |
| 2026-05-31 | 1 | 3500 | 1300 | 2.69 | 3 |
| 2026-06-01 | 1 | 3500 | 1300 | 2.69 | 4 |
| 2026-06-02 | 1 | 3500 | 1300 | 2.69 | 5 |
| 2026-06-03 | 1 | 3500 | 1300 | 2.69 | 6 |
| 2026-06-04 | 1 | 3500 | 1300 | 2.69 | 7 |
| 2026-06-05 | 1 | 3500 | 1300 | 2.69 | 8 |
| 2026-06-06 | 1 | 3500 | 1300 | 2.69 | 9 |
| 2026-06-17 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | N/A |
| 2026-06-18 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | 1 |
| 2026-06-19 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | 2 |
| 2026-06-20 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | 3 |
| 2026-06-21 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | 4 |
| 2026-06-22 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | 5 |
| 2026-06-23 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | 6 |
| 2026-06-24 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | 7 |
| 2026-06-25 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | 8 |
| 2026-06-26 | 2 | 3600 | 1264 | 2.85 | 5 |
| 2026-06-27 | 2 | 3600 | 1264 | 2.85 | 6 |
| 2026-06-28 | 2 | 3600 | 1264 | 2.85 | 7 |
| 2026-06-29 | 2 | 3600 | 1264 | 2.85 | 8 |
| 2026-06-30 | 2 | 3600 | 1264 | 2.85 | 9 |
| 2026-07-01 | 2 | 3600 | 1264 | 2.85 | 10 |
| 2026-07-02 | 2 | 3600 | 1264 | 2.85 | 11 |
| 2026-07-03 | 3 | 3533 | 1276 | 2.77 | 8 |
| 2026-07-04 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 7 |
| 2026-07-05 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 8 |
| 2026-07-06 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 9 |
| 2026-07-07 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 10 |
| 2026-07-08 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 11 |
| 2026-07-09 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 12 |
| 2026-07-10 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 13 |
| 2026-07-11 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 14 |
| 2026-07-12 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 15 |
| 2026-07-13 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 16 |
| 2026-07-14 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 17 |
| 2026-07-15 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 18 |
| 2026-07-16 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 19 |
| 2026-07-17 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 20 |
| 2026-07-18 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 21 |
| 2026-07-19 | 4 | 3475 | 1232 | 2.83 | 22 |
| 2026-07-20 | 3 | 3533 | 1276 | 2.77 | 25 |
| 2026-07-21 | 3 | 3533 | 1276 | 2.77 | 26 |
| 2026-07-22 | 3 | 3533 | 1276 | 2.77 | 27 |
| 2026-07-23 | 3 | 3533 | 1276 | 2.77 | 28 |
| 2026-07-24 | 3 | 3533 | 1276 | 2.77 | 29 |
| 2026-07-25 | 4 | 3498 | 1232 | 2.85 | 22 |
| 2026-07-26 | 4 | 3498 | 1232 | 2.85 | 23 |
| 2026-07-27 | 4 | 3498 | 1232 | 2.85 | 24 |
| 2026-07-28 | 4 | 3498 | 1232 | 2.85 | 25 |
| 2026-07-29 | 4 | 3498 | 1232 | 2.85 | 26 |
| 2026-07-30 | 4 | 3498 | 1232 | 2.85 | 27 |
| 2026-07-31 | 4 | 3498 | 1232 | 2.85 | 28 |
| 2026-08-01 | 4 | 3498 | 1232 | 2.85 | 29 |
| 2026-08-02 | 4 | 3497 | 1232 | 2.85 | 23 |
| 2026-08-03 | 4 | 3497 | 1232 | 2.85 | 24 |
| 2026-08-04 | 4 | 3497 | 1232 | 2.85 | 25 |
| 2026-08-05 | 4 | 3497 | 1232 | 2.85 | 26 |
| 2026-08-06 | 4 | 3497 | 1232 | 2.85 | 27 |
| 2026-08-07 | 4 | 3497 | 1232 | 2.85 | 28 |
| 2026-08-08 | 4 | 3497 | 1232 | 2.85 | 29 |
| 2026-08-09 | 3 | 3530 | 1233 | 2.87 | 25 |
| 2026-08-10 | 3 | 3530 | 1233 | 2.87 | 26 |
| 2026-08-11 | 3 | 3530 | 1233 | 2.87 | 27 |
| 2026-08-12 | 3 | 3530 | 1233 | 2.87 | 28 |
| 2026-08-13 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 38 |
| 2026-08-14 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 39 |
| 2026-08-15 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 40 |
| 2026-08-16 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 41 |
| 2026-08-17 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 42 |
| 2026-08-18 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 43 |
| 2026-08-19 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 44 |
| 2026-08-20 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 45 |
| 2026-08-21 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 46 |
| 2026-08-22 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 47 |
| 2026-08-23 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 48 |
| 2026-08-24 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 49 |
| 2026-08-25 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 50 |
| 2026-08-26 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 51 |
| 2026-08-27 | 2 | 3595 | 1200 | 3.00 | 52 |
| 2026-08-28 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | 72 |
| 2026-08-29 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | 73 |
| 2026-08-30 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | 74 |
| 2026-08-31 | 1 | 3800 | 1300 | 2.92 | 75 |
12-Month Market Dynamics & Trend Trajectory
Landmark of Thornhill I realizes an average rent of $3,400/month at $2.77 per square foot, positioning the building $784 above the Markham West submarket average lease rent of $2,616 while pricing $0.75 per square foot below the submarket's $3.52 rate. The building trades at a 21.3% discount to submarket per-square-foot pricing, meaning tenants gain meaningful space value relative to nearby inventory despite the higher nominal rent. Pricing discipline at Landmark of Thornhill I is firm: all four tracked leases closed at exactly 100% of asking with zero dollar variance and no annualized concession or premium. No leases settled below asking, indicating landlords maintained full list-price integrity across the sample. The absence of any discount or premium suggests a balanced micro-market where asking prices already reflect clearing levels, leaving little room for either tenant leverage or landlord upside.
Historical building statistics - leased transactions
This section tracks completed leasing transactions over time starting from May 1, 2026. Use the filters below to refine the trends by unit type, parking, den, and price performance.
Latest leased insights and trends
| Date | Units Leased | Avg Leased Price ($) | Avg SqFt (SF) | Avg PSF ($/SF) | Avg DOM (Days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-07 | 1 | 3500 | 1300 | 2.69 | 10 |
| 2026-06-14 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-06-21 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-06-28 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-07-05 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-07-12 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-07-19 | 1 | 3250 | 1100 | 2.95 | 16 |
| 2026-07-26 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-08-02 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-08-09 | 2 | 3425 | 1264 | 2.71 | 28 |
Nearby Building Rental Comparables & Price Spreads
Direct rental rate comparisons against residential properties in the immediate vicinity.
Landmark of Thornhill I at 7805 Bayview Ave sits in a tight cluster of four nearby competitors within 280 metres, all recording active lease volume over the trailing 180 days. The two closest peers—Landmark of Thornhill III at 7905 Bayview Ave (0.15 km, built in 1991, 1 closed lease) and Landmark of Thornhill II at 7825 Bayview Ave (0.16 km, built in 1991, 2 closed leases)—are same-generation siblings from the original Graywood Developments phase. Slightly further out, Royal Bayview South Tower at 399 Royal Orchard Blvd (0.26 km, completed 2025, 2 closed leases) and Royal Bayview North Tower at 397 Royal Orchard Blvd (0.28 km, completed 2025, 4 closed leases) represent a newer construction cohort that has already generated meaningful transaction flow. No competitor in this set recorded zero lease activity, so every figure cited below reflects realized market pricing rather than architectural reference only. The four-comparable benchmark averages $3,935 per month in realized rent, $4.22 per square foot, and 1,122 square feet of interior space. Landmark of Thornhill I's all-time realized average of $3,400 per month and $2.77 per square foot places it below the comp cluster on both nominal rent and rate-per-foot, while its 1,232-square-foot average suite footprint exceeds the comp mean by roughly 110 square feet. Against the submarket-wide Markham West benchmarks of $2,616 per month and $3.52 per square foot, the subject still trades at a premium on absolute rent but at a discount on the per-foot rate, a pattern driven entirely by its larger interior footprint relative to the newer, more compact Royal Bayview product. The building's 1991 construction era gives it a mature, established character that differentiates it from the 2025 Royal Bayview towers while keeping it in direct structural competition with its two Bayview Avenue siblings.
Comparable Analysis & Questions
How do rental rates at Landmark of Thornhill I compare to neighbouring buildings within Markham West?
Landmark of Thornhill I's all-time average realized lease rent of $3,400 per month sits $535 below the four-comparable benchmark of $3,935, yet it actually commands a higher monthly rent than every single competitor in this immediate pocket. Landmark of Thornhill III (7905 Bayview Ave, 0.15 km, 1 closed lease) averaged $4,000 per month, meaning the subject's realized rent is $600 lower; Landmark of Thornhill II (7825 Bayview Ave, 0.16 km, 2 closed leases) averaged $3,700, a $300 gap in the comp's favour; Royal Bayview South Tower (399 Royal Orchard Blvd, 0.26 km, 2 closed leases) averaged $3,600, $200 above the subject; and Royal Bayview North Tower (397 Royal Orchard Blvd, 0.28 km, 4 closed leases) averaged $4,438, the widest spread at $1,038 above the subject. All four competitors recorded at least one closed lease transaction over the trailing 180 days, so every figure here reflects realized market pricing rather than a zero-transaction reference.
Does Landmark of Thornhill I offer a competitive price-per-square-foot ($/SF) against local comparables?
Landmark of Thornhill I's realized rate of $2.77 per square foot across an average 1,232-square-foot suite undercuts the comp cluster benchmark of $4.22 per square foot and 1,122 square feet, delivering more interior space at a materially lower per-foot cost than three of the four nearby alternatives. Against Landmark of Thornhill II (7825 Bayview Ave, 0.16 km), the subject trades at a $3.36 per square foot discount while providing 382 more interior square feet, so the $300-per-month nominal gap in the comp's favour is entirely a footprint effect rather than an asset-valuation signal. The same dynamic holds against Royal Bayview South Tower (0.26 km), where the subject offers a $1.43 per square foot discount and 357 additional square feet, and against Royal Bayview North Tower (0.28 km), where the discount is $1.41 per square foot with 169 more square feet. The one exception is Landmark of Thornhill III (0.15 km), where the subject commands a $0.42 per square foot premium but provides 468 fewer interior square feet, making the $600-per-month rent gap a genuine rate differential on a smaller unit. In every case where the subject's nominal rent appears lower than a competitor's, the trade-off is driven by the subject's larger interior footprint, not by weaker asset positioning.
How do building age, amenities, and developer reputation impact rent spreads?
Landmark of Thornhill I fields a 12-item amenity suite that includes an indoor pool, sauna and steam room, tennis and pickleball court, squash and racquetball court, rooftop terrace, and a dedicated media and theatre room, positioning it as the most sport- and recreation-heavy option in this immediate pocket. The two 1991 Bayview Avenue siblings share the core pool-and-racquet-sport package but add a hot tub and jacuzzi plus a garden and courtyard that the subject does not offer, while the subject counters with a rooftop terrace and media and theatre room absent from both. Against the 2025 Royal Bayview towers, the contrast sharpens: the South Tower adds a yoga studio and garden courtyard the subject lacks, but omits the tennis and pickleball court, squash and racquetball court, meeting room, and media and theatre room that define the subject's lifestyle package; the North Tower introduces a golf simulator, library and reading room, EV charging station, and yoga studio, yet still does not match the subject's dual racquet-sport courts or dedicated meeting room. The tenant demographic best served by this building's amenity mix is the active, mid-career professional or small family who prioritizes on-site racquet sports, a rooftop social space, and a full indoor pool over the wellness-studio and tech-charging features that anchor the newer Royal Bayview product.
Building Amenities, Transit & Neighbourhood Features
Building amenities and neighbouring residential communities around Landmark of Thornhill I.
Building Amenities
- Concierge & Security
- Gym & Fitness Centre
- Indoor Pool
- Sauna & Steam Room
- Tennis & Pickleball Court
- Squash & Racquetball Court
- Party & Lounge Room
- Meeting Room
- Media & Theatre Room
- Games & Billiards Room
- BBQ Area
- Rooftop Terrace
Residential Buildings in the Vicinity
- Landmark of Thornhill III148 m
- Landmark of Thornhill II157 m
- Royal Bayview - South Tower262 m
- Royal Bayview - North Tower283 m
- Eden Park Towers - Building B1.8 km
- Eden Park Towers - Building C1.8 km
- Thornhill Orchards I1.9 km
- Eden Park Towers - Building A1.9 km
- Eden Park II - Building G1.9 km
- Royal Orchard II1.9 km
- Eden Park II - Building H1.9 km
- Royal Orchard1.9 km
Data Methodology & Analytical Standards
How FastScreen aggregates public listing records, tracks active inventory, and calculates rental market metrics for Landmark of Thornhill I.
Snapshot Dates & Benchmark Cadence
- Standardized Snapshot: Market metrics reflect a standardized monthly snapshot locked as of August 31, 2026.
- Benchmark Comparison Cadence: Month-over-month comparisons evaluate changes across standardized month-end reporting windows (August 2026 vs July 2026), ensuring consistent baseline periods and eliminating intra-month reporting volatility.
- Point-in-Time Daily History: Daily charts capture point-in-time active listings available on any given calendar day.
Public Data Aggregation & Thresholds
- Public Data Aggregation: FastScreen aggregates residential rental listing and completed lease transaction records from publicly available sources.
- Threshold Filtering: All listings are subject to a minimum monthly rental threshold of $1,000 to filter out standalone storage lockers, private parking spaces, and misclassified commercial entries from condominium statistics.
Calculation Formulations
- Average Asking Rent: Weighted average of active asking prices across available suites in the reporting period.
- Price Per Square Foot ($/SF): Calculated by dividing rent by square footage only for listings that provide unit dimensions (suites without stated square footage are excluded from $/SF calculations).
- Days on Market (DOM): Measures elapsed calendar days between the date a suite is first listed and either the benchmark snapshot date (for active listings) or the finalized date leased.
- Parking & Den Differentials: Average asking rent differences between suites with vs. without parking, and suites with vs. without a den.
Data Limitations & Scope
- Exclusively Public Records: Statistics are derived exclusively from publicly available rental listings and completed lease records. Private direct-to-landlord arrangements, unadvertised tenant renewals, and off-market rental agreements are not captured.
- Agreed Contract Amounts: Reported lease amounts reflect agreed contract rents and do not account for private move-in allowances or individual unit renovations that may influence pricing spreads.
Disclaimer: The information and statistics presented on this page (including asking rents, lease prices, de-listed listings, average square footage, days on market, and implied suite premiums) are aggregated from public listing sources for general informational, educational, and reference purposes only. FastScreen does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any data shown. This information does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or professional real estate advice. Users should conduct their own independent research and consult with licensed professionals before making any rental, leasing, property management, or real estate investment decisions.
