Market Data as of August 31, 2026
Royal Gardens - I — Rental Market Data
Building Summary & Rental Market Overview
Rental market analytics and building profile as of August 31, 2026.
Royal Gardens – I at 370 Highway 7 E in Richmond Hill is a 208-suite residential building completed in 2014 by Liberty Development Corp., currently showing four active listings against a 1.9 percent availability rate. The building closed four leases in the trailing 30 days at an average of $2,206 per month and a 41-day average time on market, while the broader 90-day window recorded six closed leases averaging $2,321 per month with a 31-day average DOM.
Active asking rents at Royal Gardens – I average $2,383 per month across 650 square feet of space, translating to $3.68 per square foot, which sits slightly below the 90-day realized lease rate of $3.70 per square foot. Current listings are more compact than the all-time lease average of 704 square feet, so the modest rate differential reflects tighter footprints rather than a pricing premium. Against the Richmond Hill submarket asking benchmark of $3.82 per square foot, Royal Gardens – I trades at a 3.7 percent discount on a rate-per-area basis.
Active listings have sat on market for an average of 38 days, exceeding the submarket benchmark of 28 days and signaling mild leasing deceleration despite the building's otherwise tight occupancy. Across all tracked closed transactions, tenants secured an average concession of $38 per month, or 1.53 percent below asking, with 36.4 percent of leases closing under the initial list price. Inventory depth is thin: the 1-Bedroom + Den tier offers two units, while both the 1-Bedroom and 2-Bedroom tiers carry a single listing each, leaving renters with limited choice within the building.
Get Monthly Rental Market Updates for Royal Gardens - I
Stay ahead of pricing shifts. Monthly summary of closed lease contracts, active asking rates, and available inventory direct to your inbox.
Active Rental Inventory & Asking Rates
Current market availability, asking prices, and unit price histories at Royal Gardens - I as of August 31, 2026 (comparing August 2026 vs July 2026).
Active Market Insights & Questions
How has rental availability changed at Royal Gardens - I recently?
Royal Gardens – I lists four active units as of August 31, 2026, with asking rents ranging from $2,150 to $2,680 per month, an average of $2,383 and a median of $2,350. The average active suite spans 650 square feet at $3.68 per square foot, and the dominant layout is the 1-Bedroom + Den, accounting for 50 percent of available inventory. Current listings skew toward compact entry-level and mid-size suites rather than multi-bedroom executive configurations, with only one two-bedroom unit on the market.
What floor plans and unit layouts are currently available at Royal Gardens - I?
The 1-Bedroom + Den layout leads active inventory at Royal Gardens – I with two units representing 50 percent of available space, averaging $2,350 per month across 650 square feet at $3.62 per square foot. The 1-Bedroom tier holds one listing at 25 percent share, asking $2,150 per month for 550 square feet at $3.91 per square foot, while the 2-Bedroom tier also carries a single unit at 25 percent, listed at $2,680 per month for 750 square feet at $3.57 per square foot. Each bedroom tier beyond the den option reflects a single-listing sample, so renters should treat those price points as individual transactions rather than market averages.
What is the average asking rent and $/SF by suite size at Royal Gardens - I?
Royal Gardens – I spans a $530 asking-rent spread from a $2,150 entry point to a $2,680 peak, a 24.7 percent range across its four active listings. The median asking rent sits at $2,350 per month. The entry-level suite is a 1-Bedroom of 550 square feet priced at $3.91 per square foot, while the peak offering is a 2-Bedroom of 750 square feet at $3.57 per square foot, meaning the larger unit commands a higher absolute rent but a lower rate per area.
How much extra do parking spaces and dens cost at Royal Gardens - I?
At Royal Gardens – I, the active den premium is quantified at $200 per month for an additional 100 square feet of den space, equating to a marginal cost of $2.00 per square foot for the extra room. Active parking stall premiums cannot be reliably isolated from the current dataset due to an insufficient paired sample, so no specific monthly parking figure can be quoted with confidence.
How do asking rents at Royal Gardens - I compare to local and municipal benchmarks?
Royal Gardens – I asks an average of $2,383 per month at $3.68 per square foot, compared to the Richmond Hill submarket asking benchmark of $2,800 per month and $3.82 per square foot, placing the building 3.7 percent below the submarket on a rate-per-area basis. The nominal rent gap of roughly $417 per month is largely explained by the building's more compact 650-square-foot average suite versus the broader submarket mix. Royal Gardens – I represents four out of 94 active listings in the Richmond Hill submarket, or approximately 4.3 percent of total available inventory.
Recent Leased Transactions & Contract Prices
Recent lease transactions, absorption velocity, and the difference between landlord asking prices and actual prices agreed to by tenants at Royal Gardens - I (Data period: For the month of August 2026).
Leased Transaction Insights & Questions
How many suites were leased at Royal Gardens - I last month, and how fast did they rent?
Royal Gardens - I at 370 Highway 7 E closed 4 leases in the trailing 30 days at an average 41 days on market, compared to a 90-day average of 31 DOM and a submarket benchmark of 28 DOM. The 90-day window captured 6 closings, while the full trailing year logged 11 leases at a lifetime average of 27 DOM. Leasing cadence has moderated in the most recent month: the 30-day DOM of 41 days exceeds both the 90-day and submarket averages, signaling a slight deceleration in absorption velocity relative to the broader Richmond Hill market.
What is the negotiation spread between asking rents and closed lease prices at Royal Gardens - I?
Royal Gardens - I tenants negotiated an average discount of $38 per month (1.53% below asking), translating to $456 in annual savings per unit across tracked leases. 36.4% of all closed leases settled under the listed asking price, confirming measurable tenant leverage in this submarket. The net negotiation spread of -$38 per month represents a landlord concession pattern rather than a pricing premium, with the remaining leases closing at or near asking.
What are typical executed lease prices across different layouts at Royal Gardens - I?
The two highest-volume anchor layouts at Royal Gardens - I are the 1-Bedroom (4 leases, average $2,133/month, 31 DOM) and the 1-Bedroom + Den (3 leases, average $2,348/month, 27 DOM). The 1-Bedroom tier spans a P25–P75 range of $2,095 to $2,162 across an average 550 square foot footprint at $3.88 per square foot; this is a directional reference only given the small sample size of 4 closed leases. The 1-Bedroom + Den tier averages 650 square feet at $3.61 per square foot, with rents between $2,325 and $2,372; this is likewise a limited sample of 3 leases and serves as a directional indicator only. The 2-Bedroom + Den layout (2 leases) averages $2,825/month across 833 square feet at $3.40 per square foot with a 15-day DOM; this is a small sample of just 2 transactions. The 2-Bedroom tier records a single deal at $2,800/month for 750 square feet at $3.73 per square foot with 37 DOM; this represents an individual single transaction, not a broad statistical benchmark. The 3-Bedroom+ tier also records one lease at $3,000/month for 1,175 square feet at $2.55 per square foot with 20 DOM; this is an individual single deal and should not be read as a market rate.
What measurable rent premium did suites with parking achieve in closed leases at Royal Gardens - I?
Royal Gardens - I does not have sufficient paired lease data to isolate a reliable parking premium per month. Parking fees appear bundled into suite rents across the tracked transactions, preventing a clean separation of the parking component. Active asking listings at the building also show unreliable or insufficient paired samples for parking, so no verified parking rate can be quoted for either leased or active inventory.
How does the lease-to-listing ratio at Royal Gardens - I reflect current tenant demand?
Royal Gardens - I experienced a clear downward rent trajectory from May through August 2026, with average realized rents falling from $2,620 to $2,206 over the tracked timeline. May closed 5 deals at an average of $2,620/month and $3.44 per square foot with a 21-day DOM. July recorded 2 closings at $2,550/month and $3.42 per square foot with an 11-day DOM. August logged 4 leases at $2,206/month and $3.84 per square foot with a 41-day DOM. The nominal rent drop in August reflects compact suite footprints rather than property devaluation: the rate per square foot actually rose to $3.84, the highest of the three months, indicating smaller units commanded a higher density-adjusted price.
De-Listed & Terminated Rental Market Dynamics
Analyze withdrawn listings, tenant price resistance, and subsequent re-listing discount trends at Royal Gardens - I (Data period: For the month of August 2026).
De-Listed Market Analysis & Questions
How many listings de-listed at Royal Gardens - I, and what was their re-listing price compared to previous asking?
Royal Gardens - I recorded 1 delisted unit in the trailing period, representing a 25% delisted-to-leased ratio against 30-day lease volume (4 closings) and a 9.1% ratio against lifetime lease volume. The single delisting was an expired listing; no terminated or suspended listings were recorded. At a 1.9% overall availability rate across 208 suites, this isolated delisting is a minor friction signal rather than a structural vacancy issue.
How do asking prices on de-listed suites compare to executed leases and active listings at Royal Gardens - I?
The single delisted unit at Royal Gardens - I asked an average of $2,200/month, which is $6/month below the building's realized lease average of $2,457. Nominally this lower asking price reflects a smaller suite footprint, but the unit commanded $4.00 per square foot versus the building's realized average of $3.58 per square foot. This density inversion demonstrates tenant resistance to high per-square-foot pricing on compact layouts, as the effective rate was actually 11.7% above the building's blended $/sq. ft. benchmark.
What market friction causes rental listings to stall or de-list at Royal Gardens - I?
The delisted unit at Royal Gardens - I sat on market for an average of 137 days, compared to the building's realized lease average of 27 DOM. This 110-day excess in marketing time translates to roughly 3.7 months of lost rent at the $2,200 asking rate, or approximately $8,067 in foregone rental income, plus ongoing condo maintenance fees during the unrented period. Against the 30-day lease DOM of 41 days, the excess stretches to 96 days, underscoring that this listing experienced significant pushback on price before ultimately expiring.
Historical Active Listings & Market Dynamics
Analyze availability, historical asking prices, price per foot ($/SF), and days on market over time. Use filters below to benchmark specific layouts.
| Date | Units Available | Avg Price ($) | Avg SqFt (SF) | Avg PSF ($/SF) | Avg DOM (Days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-27 | 5 | 2629 | 788 | 3.46 | 16 |
| 2026-04-28 | 6 | 2541 | 748 | 3.52 | 15 |
| 2026-04-29 | 5 | 2470 | 735 | 3.51 | 9 |
| 2026-04-30 | 5 | 2470 | 735 | 3.51 | 10 |
| 2026-05-01 | 6 | 2450 | 721 | 3.53 | 9 |
| 2026-05-02 | 6 | 2450 | 721 | 3.53 | 10 |
| 2026-05-03 | 6 | 2450 | 721 | 3.53 | 11 |
| 2026-05-04 | 5 | 2490 | 735 | 3.54 | 12 |
| 2026-05-05 | 6 | 2558 | 748 | 3.55 | 11 |
| 2026-05-06 | 6 | 2558 | 748 | 3.55 | 12 |
| 2026-05-07 | 6 | 2558 | 748 | 3.55 | 13 |
| 2026-05-08 | 6 | 2558 | 748 | 3.55 | 14 |
| 2026-05-09 | 6 | 2558 | 748 | 3.55 | 15 |
| 2026-05-10 | 6 | 2558 | 748 | 3.55 | 16 |
| 2026-05-11 | 6 | 2558 | 748 | 3.55 | 17 |
| 2026-05-12 | 6 | 2558 | 748 | 3.55 | 18 |
| 2026-05-13 | 6 | 2558 | 748 | 3.55 | 19 |
| 2026-05-14 | 4 | 2561 | 691 | 3.73 | 21 |
| 2026-05-15 | 4 | 2561 | 691 | 3.73 | 22 |
| 2026-05-16 | 3 | 2632 | 705 | 3.76 | 26 |
| 2026-05-17 | 2 | 2548 | 683 | 3.78 | 22 |
| 2026-05-18 | 2 | 2548 | 683 | 3.78 | 23 |
| 2026-05-19 | 2 | 2548 | 683 | 3.78 | 24 |
| 2026-05-20 | 2 | 2548 | 683 | 3.78 | 25 |
| 2026-05-21 | 2 | 2548 | 683 | 3.78 | 26 |
| 2026-05-22 | 2 | 2548 | 683 | 3.78 | 27 |
| 2026-05-23 | 2 | 2548 | 683 | 3.78 | 28 |
| 2026-05-24 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 38 |
| 2026-05-25 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 39 |
| 2026-05-26 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 40 |
| 2026-05-27 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 41 |
| 2026-05-28 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 42 |
| 2026-05-29 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 43 |
| 2026-05-30 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 44 |
| 2026-05-31 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 45 |
| 2026-06-01 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 46 |
| 2026-06-02 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 47 |
| 2026-06-03 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 48 |
| 2026-06-04 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 49 |
| 2026-06-05 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 50 |
| 2026-06-06 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 51 |
| 2026-06-07 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 52 |
| 2026-06-08 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 53 |
| 2026-06-09 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 18 |
| 2026-06-10 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 19 |
| 2026-06-11 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 20 |
| 2026-06-12 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 21 |
| 2026-06-13 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 22 |
| 2026-06-14 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 23 |
| 2026-06-15 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 24 |
| 2026-06-16 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 25 |
| 2026-06-17 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 26 |
| 2026-06-18 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 27 |
| 2026-06-19 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 28 |
| 2026-06-20 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 29 |
| 2026-06-21 | 3 | 2250 | 583 | 3.87 | 30 |
| 2026-06-22 | 4 | 2336 | 600 | 3.90 | 23 |
| 2026-06-23 | 4 | 2336 | 600 | 3.90 | 24 |
| 2026-06-24 | 4 | 2336 | 600 | 3.90 | 25 |
| 2026-06-25 | 5 | 2339 | 610 | 3.84 | 21 |
| 2026-06-26 | 5 | 2339 | 610 | 3.84 | 22 |
| 2026-06-27 | 5 | 2339 | 610 | 3.84 | 23 |
| 2026-06-28 | 5 | 2339 | 610 | 3.84 | 24 |
| 2026-06-29 | 5 | 2339 | 610 | 3.84 | 25 |
| 2026-06-30 | 5 | 2339 | 610 | 3.84 | 26 |
| 2026-07-01 | 5 | 2339 | 610 | 3.84 | 27 |
| 2026-07-02 | 5 | 2339 | 610 | 3.84 | 28 |
| 2026-07-03 | 5 | 2339 | 610 | 3.84 | 29 |
| 2026-07-04 | 5 | 2339 | 610 | 3.84 | 30 |
| 2026-07-05 | 5 | 2339 | 610 | 3.84 | 31 |
| 2026-07-06 | 4 | 2336 | 600 | 3.90 | 37 |
| 2026-07-07 | 5 | 2429 | 650 | 3.78 | 31 |
| 2026-07-08 | 5 | 2429 | 650 | 3.78 | 32 |
| 2026-07-09 | 5 | 2429 | 650 | 3.78 | 33 |
| 2026-07-10 | 5 | 2429 | 650 | 3.78 | 34 |
| 2026-07-11 | 5 | 2429 | 650 | 3.78 | 35 |
| 2026-07-12 | 5 | 2429 | 650 | 3.78 | 36 |
| 2026-07-13 | 5 | 2429 | 650 | 3.78 | 37 |
| 2026-07-14 | 5 | 2429 | 650 | 3.78 | 38 |
| 2026-07-15 | 5 | 2429 | 650 | 3.78 | 39 |
| 2026-07-16 | 5 | 2429 | 650 | 3.78 | 40 |
| 2026-07-17 | 4 | 2336 | 600 | 3.90 | 48 |
| 2026-07-18 | 4 | 2336 | 600 | 3.90 | 49 |
| 2026-07-19 | 4 | 2336 | 600 | 3.90 | 50 |
| 2026-07-20 | 5 | 2299 | 590 | 3.90 | 41 |
| 2026-07-21 | 5 | 2299 | 590 | 3.90 | 42 |
| 2026-07-22 | 5 | 2299 | 590 | 3.90 | 43 |
| 2026-07-23 | 5 | 2299 | 590 | 3.90 | 44 |
| 2026-07-24 | 5 | 2299 | 590 | 3.90 | 45 |
| 2026-07-25 | 5 | 2299 | 590 | 3.90 | 46 |
| 2026-07-26 | 5 | 2299 | 590 | 3.90 | 47 |
| 2026-07-27 | 5 | 2299 | 590 | 3.90 | 48 |
| 2026-07-28 | 5 | 2299 | 590 | 3.90 | 49 |
| 2026-07-29 | 5 | 2299 | 590 | 3.90 | 50 |
| 2026-07-30 | 6 | 2274 | 583 | 3.90 | 43 |
| 2026-07-31 | 6 | 2274 | 583 | 3.90 | 44 |
| 2026-08-01 | 6 | 2274 | 583 | 3.90 | 45 |
| 2026-08-02 | 6 | 2274 | 583 | 3.90 | 46 |
| 2026-08-03 | 6 | 2274 | 583 | 3.90 | 47 |
| 2026-08-04 | 6 | 2274 | 583 | 3.90 | 48 |
| 2026-08-05 | 6 | 2274 | 583 | 3.90 | 49 |
| 2026-08-06 | 6 | 2274 | 583 | 3.90 | 50 |
| 2026-08-07 | 6 | 2274 | 583 | 3.90 | 51 |
| 2026-08-08 | 5 | 2289 | 590 | 3.89 | 50 |
| 2026-08-09 | 5 | 2289 | 590 | 3.89 | 51 |
| 2026-08-10 | 5 | 2289 | 590 | 3.89 | 52 |
| 2026-08-11 | 6 | 2274 | 583 | 3.90 | 44 |
| 2026-08-12 | 7 | 2285 | 593 | 3.86 | 39 |
| 2026-08-13 | 8 | 2334 | 613 | 3.83 | 35 |
| 2026-08-14 | 8 | 2334 | 613 | 3.83 | 36 |
| 2026-08-15 | 8 | 2334 | 613 | 3.83 | 37 |
| 2026-08-16 | 8 | 2334 | 613 | 3.83 | 38 |
| 2026-08-17 | 7 | 2297 | 607 | 3.80 | 36 |
| 2026-08-18 | 7 | 2297 | 607 | 3.80 | 37 |
| 2026-08-19 | 6 | 2322 | 617 | 3.79 | 40 |
| 2026-08-20 | 6 | 2322 | 617 | 3.79 | 41 |
| 2026-08-21 | 6 | 2322 | 617 | 3.79 | 42 |
| 2026-08-22 | 6 | 2322 | 617 | 3.79 | 43 |
| 2026-08-23 | 6 | 2322 | 617 | 3.79 | 44 |
| 2026-08-24 | 6 | 2322 | 617 | 3.79 | 45 |
| 2026-08-25 | 6 | 2322 | 617 | 3.79 | 46 |
| 2026-08-26 | 6 | 2322 | 617 | 3.79 | 47 |
| 2026-08-27 | 6 | 2322 | 617 | 3.79 | 48 |
| 2026-08-28 | 6 | 2322 | 617 | 3.79 | 49 |
| 2026-08-29 | 5 | 2346 | 630 | 3.74 | 56 |
| 2026-08-30 | 5 | 2346 | 630 | 3.74 | 57 |
| 2026-08-31 | 4 | 2383 | 650 | 3.68 | 38 |
12-Month Market Dynamics & Trend Trajectory
Royal Gardens - I realizes an average lease rent of $2,457/month and $3.58 per square foot, positioning the building $100 below the Richmond Hill submarket average of $2,557 and marginally under the submarket rate of $3.63 per square foot. The building's 27-day average DOM sits one day ahead of the submarket benchmark of 28 days, indicating absorption velocity on par with the broader market despite the modest rent discount. On pricing discipline, 36.4% of tracked leases closed below asking with an average tenant discount of $38 per month (1.53%), generating $456 in annual savings per unit. The net negotiation spread of -$38 confirms a tenant-favorable environment where landlords absorbed modest concessions to close deals. The remaining leases settled at or near asking, suggesting the building's listed prices are broadly market-aligned with limited room for further discounting beyond the observed 1.5% concession band.
Historical building statistics - leased transactions
This section tracks completed leasing transactions over time starting from May 1, 2026. Use the filters below to refine the trends by unit type, parking, den, and price performance.
Latest leased insights and trends
| Date | Units Leased | Avg Leased Price ($) | Avg SqFt (SF) | Avg PSF ($/SF) | Avg DOM (Days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-10 | 3 | 2483 | 792 | 3.33 | 17 |
| 2026-05-17 | 1 | 2800 | 750 | 3.73 | 37 |
| 2026-05-24 | 1 | 2850 | 815 | 3.50 | 19 |
| 2026-05-31 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-06-07 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-06-14 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-06-21 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-06-28 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-07-05 | 1 | 2300 | 650 | 3.54 | 11 |
| 2026-07-12 | 1 | 2800 | 850 | 3.29 | 10 |
| 2026-07-19 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-07-26 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-08-02 | 1 | 2080 | 550 | 3.78 | 60 |
| 2026-08-09 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-08-16 | 2 | 2273 | 600 | 3.80 | 43 |
| 2026-08-23 | 1 | 2200 | 550 | 4.00 | 18 |
Nearby Building Rental Comparables & Price Spreads
Direct rental rate comparisons against residential properties in the immediate vicinity.
Royal Gardens - I at 370 Highway 7 E competes within a tight 240-metre corridor on Highway 7 East in Richmond Hill, flanked by its sister towers and a newer generation of product. The two closest peers—Royal Gardens - II (Crown Building) at 372 Highway 7 E, 0.12 km away, and Royal Gardens - II (Palace Building) at 376 Highway 7 E, 0.13 km away—were both completed in 2014 and recorded 15 and 6 closed leases respectively over the trailing 180 days. Slightly further east, Valleymede Towers - Building A (396 Highway 7 E, 0.17 km) and Valleymede Towers - Building B (398 Highway 7 E, 0.24 km), both completed in 2020, each logged 9 closed leases in the same window. All four competitors show active transaction volume, providing a reliable pricing benchmark across two distinct construction eras: the 2014 Royal Gardens pair and the 2020 Valleymede pair. The four-comp average sits at $2,484 per month, $3.63 per square foot, and 699 square feet of interior space. Royal Gardens - I's all-time realized lease data—$2,457 per month at $3.58 per square foot across an average 704-square-foot suite—places the subject marginally below the comp average on both rent and rate while delivering slightly more interior area. Against the Richmond Hill submarket benchmark of $2,557 per month and $3.63 per square foot, the subject trades at a modest discount on both metrics, consistent with its 2014 construction date and a value-oriented positioning relative to the newer 2020 Valleymede product.
372 Highway 7 E, Richmond Hill
376 Highway 7 E, Richmond Hill
Comparable Analysis & Questions
How do rental rates at Royal Gardens - I compare to neighbouring buildings within Richmond Hill?
Royal Gardens - I's all-time average realized lease rent of $2,457 per month sits $27 below the four-comp benchmark of $2,484, with the two Royal Gardens - II towers and the two Valleymede Towers buildings anchoring the immediate competitive set. Royal Gardens - II (Crown Building) at 372 Highway 7 E, 0.12 km away, closed 15 leases at an average of $2,289 per month, $3.64 per square foot, and 635 square feet; Royal Gardens - I's realized rent runs $168 higher than that figure. Royal Gardens - II (Palace Building) at 376 Highway 7 E, 0.13 km away, closed 6 leases at $2,308 per month, $3.92 per square foot, and 608 square feet, with the subject again $149 higher. Valleymede Towers - Building A at 396 Highway 7 E, 0.17 km away, closed 9 leases at $2,622 per month, $3.52 per square foot, and 758 square feet—$165 above the subject's realized rent. Valleymede Towers - Building B at 398 Highway 7 E, 0.24 km away, closed 9 leases at $2,717 per month, $3.44 per square foot, and 794 square feet, placing the subject $260 below that competitor. All four comparables recorded active lease transactions over the trailing 180 days, so every figure above reflects realized pricing rather than asking-only data.
Does Royal Gardens - I offer a competitive price-per-square-foot ($/SF) against local comparables?
Royal Gardens - I leases at $3.58 per square foot across an average 704-square-foot suite, positioning it at a slight rate discount to the four-comp average of $3.63 per square foot while offering marginally more interior space than the 699-square-foot comp mean. Against Royal Gardens - II (Crown Building), the subject trades at a $0.06 per square foot (1.6%) discount while providing 69 more interior square feet; the $168 higher nominal rent is driven entirely by that larger footprint rather than a rate premium. The same dynamic holds against Royal Gardens - II (Palace Building), where the subject offers a $0.34 per square foot (8.7%) discount and 96 additional square feet, yet still realizes $149 more per month because the extra area outweighs the lower per-foot rate. In contrast, Valleymede Towers - Building A commands a $0.06 per square foot (1.7%) premium over the subject while delivering 54 fewer square feet, meaning the subject's $165 lower monthly rent reflects its smaller interior footprint rather than a weaker asset valuation. Valleymede Towers - Building B widens that gap: the subject carries a $0.14 per square foot (4.1%) premium yet provides 90 fewer square feet, so the $260 lower nominal rent is a direct function of the reduced suite size. In every pairing, the rent differential tracks the square-footage delta, confirming that rate per square foot—not unit size—drives the value equation in this micro-market.
How do building age, amenities, and developer reputation impact rent spreads?
Royal Gardens - I fields a nine-item amenity package centred on aquatic wellness and social gathering, distinguishing it from both its 2014 sister towers and the 2020 Valleymede pair. The subject's Indoor Pool, Hot Tub & Jacuzzi, and Sauna & Steam Room form a full aquatic-wellness cluster that Valleymede Towers - Building A and Building B (396 and 398 Highway 7 E) do not offer; those two towers instead emphasise remote-work infrastructure with a Business Centre, Library & Reading Room, and Yoga Studio. Royal Gardens - I also includes a Media & Theatre Room and Rooftop Terrace absent from both Valleymede buildings, while the Crown Building (372 Highway 7 E) adds a Golf Simulator, Meeting Room, and Garden & Courtyard that the subject does not carry. The Palace Building (376 Highway 7 E) similarly offers a Golf Simulator and Meeting Room not found at the subject. The lifestyle package here—indoor pool, hot tub, sauna, media room, rooftop terrace, and party lounge—serves tenants who prioritise on-site recreation, social hosting, and wellness over the business-centre and co-working features that define the Valleymede product, making Royal Gardens - I the natural fit for professionals and couples seeking a resort-style residential experience within walking distance of Highway 7 East transit.
Building Amenities, Transit & Neighbourhood Features
Building amenities and neighbouring residential communities around Royal Gardens - I.
Building Amenities
- Concierge & Security
- Gym & Fitness Centre
- Party & Lounge Room
- Media & Theatre Room
- Sauna & Steam Room
- Indoor Pool
- Hot Tub & Jacuzzi
- Rooftop Terrace
- BBQ Area
Residential Buildings in the Vicinity
- Royal Gardens - II (Crown Building)117 m
- Royal Gardens - II (Palace Building)127 m
- Pavilia Towers - Building B140 m
- Valleymede Towers - Building A167 m
- Pavilia Towers - Building A186 m
- Thornhill Tower II200 m
- Galleria Tower218 m
- Valleymede Towers - Building B236 m
- Thornhill Tower I252 m
- Victoria Tower318 m
- Parkview Tower II344 m
- Parkview Tower I350 m
Data Methodology & Analytical Standards
How FastScreen aggregates public listing records, tracks active inventory, and calculates rental market metrics for Royal Gardens - I.
Snapshot Dates & Benchmark Cadence
- Standardized Snapshot: Market metrics reflect a standardized monthly snapshot locked as of August 31, 2026.
- Benchmark Comparison Cadence: Month-over-month comparisons evaluate changes across standardized month-end reporting windows (August 2026 vs July 2026), ensuring consistent baseline periods and eliminating intra-month reporting volatility.
- Point-in-Time Daily History: Daily charts capture point-in-time active listings available on any given calendar day.
Public Data Aggregation & Thresholds
- Public Data Aggregation: FastScreen aggregates residential rental listing and completed lease transaction records from publicly available sources.
- Threshold Filtering: All listings are subject to a minimum monthly rental threshold of $1,000 to filter out standalone storage lockers, private parking spaces, and misclassified commercial entries from condominium statistics.
Calculation Formulations
- Average Asking Rent: Weighted average of active asking prices across available suites in the reporting period.
- Price Per Square Foot ($/SF): Calculated by dividing rent by square footage only for listings that provide unit dimensions (suites without stated square footage are excluded from $/SF calculations).
- Days on Market (DOM): Measures elapsed calendar days between the date a suite is first listed and either the benchmark snapshot date (for active listings) or the finalized date leased.
- Parking & Den Differentials: Average asking rent differences between suites with vs. without parking, and suites with vs. without a den.
Data Limitations & Scope
- Exclusively Public Records: Statistics are derived exclusively from publicly available rental listings and completed lease records. Private direct-to-landlord arrangements, unadvertised tenant renewals, and off-market rental agreements are not captured.
- Agreed Contract Amounts: Reported lease amounts reflect agreed contract rents and do not account for private move-in allowances or individual unit renovations that may influence pricing spreads.
Disclaimer: The information and statistics presented on this page (including asking rents, lease prices, de-listed listings, average square footage, days on market, and implied suite premiums) are aggregated from public listing sources for general informational, educational, and reference purposes only. FastScreen does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any data shown. This information does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or professional real estate advice. Users should conduct their own independent research and consult with licensed professionals before making any rental, leasing, property management, or real estate investment decisions.
